Even One Share Requires Recusal

American Intelligence Media

This post/analysis in 2014 stands the test of time. We have pulled out and highlighted the “even one share” portion of the judicial rules on disclosing conflicts that Amy Berman Jackson is so flagrantly violating. To those that think our recent posts about all the financial conflicts from the swamp bottom feeders are ‘much to do about nothing’, think again.

Even ONE SHARE must be disclosed.

It’s not illegal to own the shares, but our politicians MUST disclose this info….and judges must recuse themselves with even ONE SHARE of conflict. To date, they haven’t done diddly squat except lie, lie, and lie again. Oh yeah…and fill their offshore bank accounts with illegal activities.

What about all those Supreme Court judges that owned Facebook stock when they were ruling on Leader Technology’s patent case? The enhanced the surveillance state with technology that was not theirs, but the SCOTUS scumbags supported James…

View original post 171 more words

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.